Jump to content

User talk:The Missing Piece

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hi Missing Piece, if I may call you thus, it is a pity we don't have real names here. First of all I wish to apologise for mistakenly rectifying your additions to the "German modal particle" article. I, as a German speaker, should have known better than laying down the law about this, but I really wasn't aware of the difference between Partikeln in linguistics and Partikel in physics and natural sciences. It appears the linguistic version is feminine and has the plural Partikeln, whereas the scientific version has the neuter and therefore has the plural Partikel. You can see all this in the German Wiktionary version [1], which is very well laid out.

What misled me further was the excellent Wortschatz website of the University of Leipzig; [2] which gave in its first two pages nothing but scientific types of Partikel citations without the final n, which of course misled me into thinking all plurals would be Partikel. So, it might be just as well to keep this in mind, I don't know whether you are likely to edit Wiki articles dealing with scientific content in which the plural is definitely Partikel.

If you look the Wortschatz website up you will get their home page first and you choose "Partikel" in the box, wherupon you will get whatever you are looking for.

"Canoo net Services" are very naughty not to point this out, in fact all they do is refer to the linguistic version. Somebody ought to point this out to them. Anyway, there it is. You did right to revert the article to what it was. Sorry have put wrong address into summary.Dieter Simon 01:29, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

COTW Project

[edit]

You voted for Storm, this week's Collaboration of the week. Please come and help it become a featured-standard article. PDXblazers 23:57, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

[edit]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs
Isar
Cobalt (color)
Base 30
Moosburg
Hexavigesimal
Loisach
Cosmos
Attic numerals
Amper
Viridian
Etruscan numerals
Septemvigesimal
Quinary
Blue club
Wolfratshausen
Base32
Landau an der Isar
COGEMA La Hague site
Korean numerals
Cleanup
Inverse synthetic aperture radar
Exodus Ministries
Italian literature
Merge
Universitas Gadjah Mada
Loan
Black Fox
Add Sources
Record label
Third-person shooter
Tory
Wikify
Aaron Brown
Chicks on Speed
Mohammed Zahur Khayyam
Expand
Austrian Empire
Voyager 2
Nuclear explosive

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 01:26, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Using "preview"

[edit]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edit(s) to Travian, it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thank you. --McGeddon (talk) 16:00, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Much credit to you on your edits to Travian - the article reads much better now, and you seem to have a good eye for detail, which is always appreciated around here. --McGeddon (talk) 21:41, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why the heck did you change the Azura Skye article into an article about a Buffy episode? -Duribald (talk) 05:48, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, ok, it seems like an honest mistake. Just keep an eye on that software you're using. :-) -Duribald (talk) 04:47, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

[edit]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs
Massively multiplayer online real-time strategy
The Drugs Don't Work
Max Planck Institute for Nuclear Physics
Portree
A Northern Soul
Server socket
Digital distribution
God game
Kesmai
Dungeon (computer game)
John Savident
Peter Preston
Wolfratshausen
Peter Sissons
WxPython
List of hospitals in Germany
Mangelwurzel
Mein Herz brennt
Command post
Cleanup
Storm chasing
Fairchild F8
Air Warrior
Merge
Force carrier
Gross profit
Enema
Add Sources
Project Sherwood
Trailer (film)
The Saga of Ryzom
Wikify
Decontrol
MIMD
Beverly, Chicago
Expand
Bahamut
Kazaa Lite
Costume party

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 06:02, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, The Missing Piece. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]